In both versions, the benchmark makes use of Box2D Physics engine, so why are the results in FPS so difference? This reduces the score difference by half in Geekbench 5. Running Geekbench 5, the A12X scored 6901.5 FPS, very close to 1065G7: scored 8003.2 FPS, and 48700U: scored 7667.4 FPS. Running Geekbench 4, the A12X scored only 13487.7 FPS, while the 1065G7 scored 18822.3 FPS and the 4800u scored 18635.9 FPS. On Rigid Body Physics benchmark, the FPS is much lower on Geekbench 5 compared to Geekbench 4. Those benchmarks utilizes x86 AVX and ARM NEON instructions, which are important accelerators for modern applications. Here is how the SEGMM and SFFT were implemented. On the contrary, on Geekbench 5, A12X vs 4800U and A12X vs 1065G7, the SEGMM and SFFT benchmarks, which make up the most significant difference between A12X and the two x86 CPUs, among other favorable benchmarks, were removed. On Intel desktop CPUs, the latency would be 3 times faster, would contribute to a significant higher score. So, scores seem to be similar to Geekbench 5, except for the SGEMM and SFFT benchmark, are 2 times faster for x86 CPU and 3 times faster on zen 3 vs the A12X. A12X is the last Apple chip used on Geekbench 4 and since it got the same 15W TDP with 4800u, on the same TSMC 7nm process and Intel 10nm (which is considered equal to 7nm TSCM), it would be a more accurate comparison. Nobody pays 125 million dollar for no reason.Īnonymous, Battery gate drama was entirely different.One example of A12X vs 4800U and A12X vs 1065G7 on Geekbench 4. moreOh god, just proves you people have absolutely no clue what batterygate was even about yet you all harp about it endlessly like donkeys. How the frigging hell was Apple "caught" degrading battery when they were doing performance degrading IN RESPONSE to battery degradation which comes with age and usage. Not that you Android fans would know what's like to use phone for 5+ years when you lose software support after just 2 but anyways. All the complaining came from lack of communication about the feature. Without chipset slowdown, phones were turning off and Apple mitigated that by simply slowing down chipset so it doesn't pull as much amps from battery to cause a shutdown. Phone isn't as fast, but it's still usable and wouldn't shut down anymore. They weren't doing this on phones with good batteries to imply planned obsolescence and if you replaced battery, you restored full performance. #Benchmarks deleted from geekbench allegations full# Problem was they didn't notify users about it or give them choice and that's where "battery gate" came from, not all the stuff people make up here.Īnd only reason there was lawsuit and they paid it because it's a big American company. Good luck just filing a class lawsuit with Chinese company lmao. The situation with OnePlus's "cheating" is exactly the same thing. They're being scrutinized because they didn't communicate the thing to users and they just made it a transparent function that does the job without any user knowledge or interaction. I mean, what they have to gain if they slowdown daily apps and not benchmarks? When you cheat you kinda don't restrict daily apps and you artificially boost benchmarks to score better than the rest. So, this alone makes no sense to be called "cheating". Cheating was when Realme (was it GT Neo?) was caught degrading output image in benchmarks into some mangled mess to artificially boost performance. That was specifically targeting benchmarks to cheat. This here is just running benchmarks unrestricted and it's restricting social media garbage as evident from the list of optimized apps. It's literally optimization.Įxcept for some software glitches off late, Oxygen OS was well optimized Android skins just after stock Android bare skin which is present on Pixel Line up. #Benchmarks deleted from geekbench allegations skin# I am excited to test Pixel 6/Pixel 6 Pro with snapdragon 870ish performance of battery life and CPU. #Benchmarks deleted from geekbench allegations pro# I hope this is landmark in Google/Pixel line up with respect to camera and in house chipset for better control over software. Oxygen OS was well managed till One Plus 6T/7T. Its just that they ruined everything with price and software updates after Oxygen OS 10.3.4. I hope ZTE competes with them soon by producing quality products. One Plus 3T to One Plus 7T was One Plus peak era. #Benchmarks deleted from geekbench allegations pro#.#Benchmarks deleted from geekbench allegations full#.#Benchmarks deleted from geekbench allegations skin#.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |